Goheal: What is the difference between "cutting leeks" and "shareholder cashing out"? The ca
In the market's ups and downs, the operation of capital is often accompanied by two deeply disturbing phenomena: "cutting leeks" and "shareholder cashing out". Although the two seem similar, they are actually fundamentally different. Goheal knows that the capital market is not only a battlefield for wealth appreciation, but also a game of information, strategy and power. Whether it is the "cutting leeks" style of rapid operation or the "shareholder cashing out" style of long-term capital realization, the capital operation insider hidden behind these phenomena often affects the wealth destiny of many investors.
American Goheal M&A Group
So, what do "cutting leeks" and "shareholder cashing out" mean? What is the difference between them? How do these behaviors affect the market ecology and investors' decisions? This article will lead everyone to explore these two topics in depth and reveal the "invisible game" behind the capital operation of listed companies.
1. Basic definitions of "cutting leeks" and "shareholder cashing out"
"Cutting leeks", as a common name in the capital market, refers to the act of manipulating stock prices, false information or loopholes in market rules to make retail investors take over at high prices and eventually cash out assets. It is usually manipulated by market makers, hot money or quantitative institutions to quickly attract retail investors to enter and profit from short-term speculation, quantitative harvesting, financial fraud and other means. For these traders, "cutting leeks" is an efficient game of capital plunder. Their goal is to make retail investors become victims in the fluctuations of the stock market, while they quickly make profits through precise shipping timing.
In contrast, "shareholder cashing out" is the behavior of major shareholders or actual controllers of listed companies to reduce their holdings through legal or gray means to realize wealth realization. Although this behavior appears to be compliant on the surface, it is often accompanied by infringement of the interests of small and medium-sized investors. In particular, in the process of shareholder reduction, retail investors may be induced to follow suit through false performance forecasts, repurchase plans, etc., which ultimately leads to large-scale cashing out by shareholders. The essence of this capital operation is to carefully plan and seek maximum benefits through the design of institutional loopholes and market rules.
For example, in the process of "shareholder cashing out", major shareholders of listed companies may reduce their holdings under the pretext of "improving life" and "capital needs", and gradually sell their shares at high stock prices. In this process, the correlation between shareholders' cashing out operations and stock price fluctuations often leads to distorted market prices, thereby affecting the pricing mechanism of the entire capital market.
2. In-depth comparison of the differences in behavior between the two
From the perspective of the subject of behavior, the operators of "cutting leeks" are usually short-term capital forces such as bankers, hot money, and quantitative institutions. Their goal is to obtain short-term high profits through rapid market operations. The operators of "shareholder cashing out" are mainly major shareholders or actual controllers of listed companies. Their goal is to realize their shares through legal or gray means, usually reducing their holdings when the company's stock price is high.
Legality differences are also the key to the two. Although "cutting leeks" involves illegal behaviors such as market manipulation and insider trading, it is often difficult for regulatory authorities to discover them in time due to the hidden operation methods. "Shareholder cashing out" is compliant on the surface, and shareholders' reduction of holdings is usually reported in accordance with relevant laws and regulations. However, in actual operations, it may affect the decision-making of small and medium-sized investors through false information disclosure or other gray means, and ultimately lead to market price distortion.
From the perspective of victims, the victims of "cutting leeks" are mainly retail investors, who are often harvested by manipulators due to information asymmetry and decision-making errors. The victims of "shareholder cashing out" are not only retail investors, but more of the company's small and medium-sized shareholders and the company's long-term value. Shareholder reduction of holdings may not only lead to a drop in stock prices, but also have a negative impact on the company's future growth and market confidence, thus putting the entire company in a dilemma of declining value.
In terms of time cycle, the behavior of "cutting leeks" is usually short-term, and rapid capital harvesting and manipulation may be completed within a few days or months. "Shareholder cashing out" is usually a long-term process, and shareholders gradually reduce their holdings over a period of years or even longer, and achieve wealth accumulation through phased capital operations.
3. "Compound Harvesting Techniques" in Capital Operations
In the capital operations of listed companies, there are often some operating methods that combine "cutting leeks" and "shareholder cashing out" to form a complex "compound harvesting technique". These methods not only aggravate the unfairness of the market, but also further deepen the risks of the capital market.
Market value management covers cashing out, that is, by issuing a repurchase announcement to raise the stock price, create a market "repurchase" positive, and then the major shareholders take the opportunity to reduce their holdings. However, these repurchase behaviors are often nominal, and the actual repurchase amount is far lower than the promised scale, and even the repurchase funds are all obtained by shareholders reducing their holdings. For example, a certain car company claimed to repurchase 900 million yuan, but only completed the repurchase of 2.93%. In actual operation, the major shareholder realized capital cashing out by reducing its holdings.
The double-kill mechanism of mergers and acquisitions is a way to acquire the assets of related parties at a high premium. By creating the expectation of "synergy effect", pushing up the stock price, and then making goodwill impairment through the performance explosion of the acquisition target, the previously high stock price is given back, and finally forming a double arbitrage of "mergers and acquisitions".
The design of institutional arbitrage is more complicated. It uses T+0 quantitative tools and short-selling mechanisms to cooperate with shareholders to reduce their holdings to implement two-way harvesting, and finally achieve the maximum benefits of capital operation. In addition, some companies may also evade the obligation to disclose reductions through tools such as VIE structures and offshore trusts, making the reduction behavior more concealed.
4. Supervision and investor response strategies
Faced with such complex capital operation methods, the defense gaps of regulatory authorities and the survival strategies of investors have become important issues in market governance. At present, there are still many loopholes in the reduction rules of China's capital market, such as "block trading to bidding" and "disguised reduction of convertible bonds", which may be used by illegal shareholders for capital arbitrage. The serious imbalance between the intensity of punishment for financial fraud and illegal gains has also prevented many violations in the capital market from receiving due punishment.
For investors, first of all, they need to learn to identify danger signals. When shareholders reduce their holdings and favorable information such as performance forecasts and high dividends and transfers are released simultaneously, they should be vigilant. Especially when the company's goodwill accounts for more than 30% of its net assets and the industry's prosperity is declining, they should be more careful about possible "cutting leeks" operations. At the same time, investors should pay attention to the true source of shareholders' increased holdings and performance records, and avoid being confused by false commitments to increase holdings.
5. Conclusion: "Moral Bottom Line" in the Capital Market
In general, although the two capital behaviors of "cutting leeks" and "shareholders cashing out" are different in operation methods, the final result is that small and medium-sized investors become victims and disrupt the normal operation order of the capital market. As Goheal, we always adhere to the principles of compliance and transparency, and are committed to providing investors with a more fair and stable capital operation environment.
So, can the future capital market find a more fair and transparent path in the face of increasingly complex capital operations? Will there be a more stringent regulatory mechanism to regulate these market behaviors? These issues are worth thinking and discussing with every investor and industry participant.
Goheal Group
Welcome to leave your comments in the comment area, let us explore the future of the capital market together!
[About Goheal] Goheal is a leading investment holding company focusing on global mergers and acquisitions holdings. It is deeply engaged in the three core business areas of listed company control acquisition, listed company mergers and acquisitions and restructuring, and listed company capital operation. With its deep professional strength and rich experience, it provides enterprises with full life cycle services from mergers and acquisitions to restructuring and capital operation, aiming to maximize corporate value and long-term benefit growth.
